Access key links:
Skip to content
Home page
Site map
Search this site
Accesskeys
Frequently Asked Questions
Help for site
Feedback
a
- Decrease page text size
a
- Smallest page text size in use.
A
- Increase page text size
A
- Largest page text size in use.
|
Accessibility
|
BIS blogs
|
Connect with BIS
|
Contact BIS
|
Cymraeg
Any words
All words
Exact phrase
Search for
Main menu
Home
About BIS
News
Ministers
Policies
Partners
Publications
Consultations
Transparency
Analysis
You are here:
Home
>
Policies
>
Business Law
>
Company and Partnership law
>
Companies Act 2006
>
FAQ Companies Act 2006
>
What is left behind in the 1985, 1989 and 2004 Acts
Sub menu
Policies
Business Law
Company and Partnership law
Companies Act 2006
FAQ Companies Act 2006
Addresses (directors' and members' or shareholders')
Annual Returns
Articles of Association (Including Entrenchment)
Charges/Security Interests
Company Law - what's in force?
Company Secretary
Derivative Claims
Directors FAQs
Distributions
E-Communications
Execution of documents
Expenses of winding up - section 1282 Companies Act 2006
Financial assistance by private companies for acquisition of own shares
Indirect Investors
Names
Overseas Companies
Political Donations and Expenditure
Registers and Records
Resolutions and Meetings
Restoration to the Register
Share Capital
Shareholder Rights
Stationery, Websites & Signs
What is left behind in the 1985, 1989 and 2004 Acts
What is left behind in the 1985, 1989 and 2004 Acts
Contents
What parts of the non-company law of the Acts will remain?
What is left behind in the 1985 Act?
What is left behind in the 1989 Act ?
What is left behind in the 2004 Act ?
What provisions do not have a place in the new comprehensive statement of company law in the Act?
What parts of the non-company law of the Acts will remain?
Some Scots Law provisions, which are now devolved to the Scottish Parliament, and which are being replaced by the Scottish Parliament.
Provisions about the Financial Reporting Council which are about the operation of that body and its subsidiaries, not about how companies generally conduct themselves
Provisions about assisting overseas regulatory authorities, about financial markets, about the Financial Reporting Review Panel, and about insolvency all of which relate more to financial services law than company law.
Back to Top
What is left behind in the 1985 Act?
Company Investigations
Orders imposing restrictions on shares following an investigation
Provisions about Scottish floating charges and receivers
Back to Top
What is left behind in the 1989 Act ?
Powers to require information and documents to assist overseas regulatory authorities.
Provisions about Scottish incorporated charities.
Amendments and savings consequential upon the changes in the law made by the 1989 Act.
Provisions about financial markets and insolvency.
Back to Top
What is left behind in the 2004 Act ?
The provisions extending the functions of the Financial Reporting Review Panel (FRRP) to interim accounts and reports.
Provisions about the financing and liability of the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and its subsidiary bodies.
Community interest companies.
Back to Top
What provisions do not have a place in the new comprehensive statement of company law in the Act?
Investigations can go beyond companies to cover other types of organisation.
The Scots law provisions left behind are now devolved to the Scottish Parliament.
The provisions about assisting overseas regulatory authorities, about financial markets and insolvency and about the FRRP relate more to financial services law than company law.
The provisions about the FRC are about the operation of that body and its subsidiaries, not about how companies generally conduct themselves.
The provisions about community interest companies form a complete code which is additional for company law and sits alongside it rather than forming part of it.
Back to Top
Print this page
Follow @bisgovuk